Alternatives to selfcontrol8/18/2023 Yet, the importance of understanding the nature of self-control measures cannot be understated. That all these measures relate to a common construct called self-control has been assumed often by face-validity (e.g., “I am good at resisting temptations” Stroop performance requires inhibiting word-reading), but seldom investigated empirically (cf., Duckworth & Kern, 2011). The lack of empirical correlation between measures of self-control do not invalidate either measure, but instead suggest that treatments of the construct of self-control need to pay greater attention to convergent validity among the many measures used to operationalize self-control. Consequently, theoretical and practical conclusions drawn using one measure (e.g., the Self-Control Scale) cannot be generalised to findings using the other (e.g., the Stroop task). These results suggest that the field’s most widely used measure of self-reported self-control is uncorrelated with two of the most widely adopted executive functioning measures of self-control. The Bayesian meta-analytical summary of all five data-sets further favoured a null relationship between both types of measurement. Overall, Bayesian correlational analyses suggested little-to-no relationship between self-reported self-control and performance on the Stroop and Flanker tasks. In a series of five data-sets (overall N = 2,641) and a mini meta-analysis, we explored the association between canonical operationalisations of self-control: The Self-Control Scale and two measures of inhibition-related executive functioning (the Stroop and Flanker paradigms). Self-control is assessed using a remarkable array of measures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |